Use of Clearview AI by Ontario Provincial Police

From Security Vision
Revision as of 17:58, 20 April 2024 by Francesco (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "--- end citebot ---" to "<!--End Citebot--></div>")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Use of Clearview AI by Ontario Provincial Police
Excluded from graph
Deployment Status Concluded
Deployment Start Date
Deployment End Date
Events * uses Record type Property:Has event

Start (1 December 2019, Documented, ?, No description)

End (14 February 2020, Documented, , No description)

City Orillia
Country Canada
Involved Entities
Keywords
Technology Deployed Clearview (Software)
Information Certainty Documented
Primary sources 1
Datasets Used Clearview AI (Dataset)
Deployment Type Criminal investigations
runs search software
managed by Clearview AI
used by Ontario Provincial Police
Potentially used by
Information Certainty 0
Summary 0


Deployment Purpose: Criminal investigations

Summary
0


Products and Institutions:

Product DeployedClearview (Software)
Institutions Clearview AI
DatasetsClearview AI (Dataset)
Search software

Status and Events:

StatusConcluded
EventsStart (1 December 2019, Documented, ?, No description)
End (14 February 2020, Documented, , No description)
Start Date
End Date

Users:

Involved Entities
Managed byClearview AI
Used byOntario Provincial Police


Location:

CityOrillia
Country Canada
Loading map...


Description[ ]

Ontario Provincial Police have confirmed use of the controversial facial recognition software known as Clearview AI.

The police force says some officers with units investigating child sexual exploitation, human trafficking, cyber crime as well as the digital forensics division, had accessed “a free online trial version” of the application since December but were later told to discontinue using it.

The technology was mostly used to identify victims, the OPP said in a statement on Sunday.

In one case, “following further investigation, a suspect was identified and charged with child pornography-related offences.”

“Other testing of the tool was limited to members entering their own images to assess the viability of the software.” 1