Facial Recognition during the Gold Coast Commonwealth Games

From Security Vision
Revision as of 17:28, 20 April 2024 by Francesco (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "--- end citebot ---" to "<!--End Citebot--></div>")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Facial Recognition during the Gold Coast Commonwealth Games
Excluded from graph
Deployment Status Stopped
Deployment Start Date
Deployment End Date
Events * uses Record type Property:Has event

Start (2 April 2018, Documented, , No description)

End (9 April 2018, Documented, , No description)

City Gold Coast
Country Australia
Involved Entities Australian Defence Force
Keywords
Technology Deployed Unknown Products 0030
Information Certainty Documented
Primary sources 1
Datasets Used Unknown Dataset 0071
Deployment Type Criminal investigations
runs search software
managed by Queensland Police
used by Queensland Police
Potentially used by
Information Certainty 0
Summary 0


Deployment Purpose: Criminal investigations

Summary
0


Products and Institutions:

Product DeployedUnknown Products 0030
Institutions 
DatasetsUnknown Dataset 0071
Search software

Status and Events:

StatusStopped
EventsStart (2 April 2018, Documented, , No description)
End (9 April 2018, Documented, , No description)
Start Date
End Date

Users:

Involved EntitiesAustralian Defence Force
Managed byQueensland Police
Used byQueensland Police


Location:

CityGold Coast
Country Australia
Loading map...


Description[ ]

The Gold Coast Games was subjected to the most expansive and intrusive public surveillance operation to be used by Australian police. The evaluation report reveals that no “high-priority targets” could be identified by the software, leading to the use of the technology for general surveillance – completely at odds with assurances by police regarding the basis for the investment and its level of effectiveness 1

At the time, QPS Deputy Commissioner Gollschewski said “there is no specific threat against the Games or against anything in Queensland, but of course we live in a probable-threat environment.” This type of language was used to justify the introduction of protective security zones around 23 Games venues and the heavy and light rail networks. This new status gave police increased powers to detain, search and move people on. It was this same language of potential terrorist attacks that justifies more intrusive surveillance regimes. In Queensland, the mass surveillance technology can only ordinarily be used to identify suspects for crimes that could attract a sentence of at least of three years in prison 1

References

  1. a b c  "Queensland’s Facial Recognition Regime a Complete Failure". (2019) <https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/queenslands-facial-recognition-regime-a-complete-failure/> Accessed: 2022-06-29