Difference between revisions of "DataWorks Plus"

From Security Vision
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replacement - "|Institution Sector=Software" to "|Institution Sector=Technology")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Institution
 
{{Institution
 
|Institution Full Name=DataWorks Plus
 
|Institution Full Name=DataWorks Plus
|Not in graph=Greens Report 2021
 
 
|City=Greenvillle (SC)
 
|City=Greenvillle (SC)
 
|Institution Type=Company
 
|Institution Type=Company
|Institution Sector=Technology, Security
+
|Institution Sector=Security
 +
|Not in graph=Greens Report 2021
 
|Research Category=Object of Analysis
 
|Research Category=Object of Analysis
 
|Keywords=Computer Vision, Facial Recognition
 
|Keywords=Computer Vision, Facial Recognition

Latest revision as of 18:40, 19 February 2024

DataWorks Plus
Institution Full Name DataWorks Plus
Excluded from graph Greens Report 2021
Creation Date
City Greenvillle (SC)
Branches
Is Department Of
Institution Type Company
Instititution Sector Security
Importance 0
Clients


Keywords Computer Vision, Facial Recognition
Related Institutions


Institution Sector: Security



Description[edit | ]

Controversy[edit | ]

In 2019, algorithms from both companies were included in a federal study of over 100 facial recognition systems that found they were biased, falsely identifying African-American and Asian faces 10 times to 100 times more than Caucasian faces.[1]

Todd Pastorini[1]

  1. 1.0 1.1 hillWrongfullyAccusedAlgorithm2020