Difference between revisions of "DataWorks Plus"
From Security Vision
m (Text replacement - "|Institution Sector=Software" to "|Institution Sector=Technology") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Institution | {{Institution | ||
|Institution Full Name=DataWorks Plus | |Institution Full Name=DataWorks Plus | ||
− | |||
|City=Greenvillle (SC) | |City=Greenvillle (SC) | ||
|Institution Type=Company | |Institution Type=Company | ||
− | |Institution Sector= | + | |Institution Sector=Security |
+ | |Not in graph=Greens Report 2021 | ||
|Research Category=Object of Analysis | |Research Category=Object of Analysis | ||
|Keywords=Computer Vision, Facial Recognition | |Keywords=Computer Vision, Facial Recognition |
Latest revision as of 18:40, 19 February 2024
Institution Sector: Security
Description[edit | ]
Controversy[edit | ]
In 2019, algorithms from both companies were included in a federal study of over 100 facial recognition systems that found they were biased, falsely identifying African-American and Asian faces 10 times to 100 times more than Caucasian faces.[1]