Difference between revisions of "Facial Recognition in Brussels Airport (Stopped)"

From Security Vision
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
  
  
 +
[[Deployment Status::Finished]]
 
==Possible use of Clearview AI==
 
==Possible use of Clearview AI==
 
<blockquote>The tests at Brussels Airport – as well as recent reporting on possible use by police officers of Clearview AI – shows that clear legal guidelines are needed. As the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) rightfully states in its recent guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices, the use of biometric data – facial recognition in particular – entails heightened risks for data subjects’ rights. Certainly, both police forces and citizens would benefit from legal clarity. It would appear from the Commission white paper on AI that the Commission shares this view, as they allude on further regulation of systems for facial recognition.[[CiteRef::peetersFacialRecognitionBrussels2020]]</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>The tests at Brussels Airport – as well as recent reporting on possible use by police officers of Clearview AI – shows that clear legal guidelines are needed. As the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) rightfully states in its recent guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices, the use of biometric data – facial recognition in particular – entails heightened risks for data subjects’ rights. Certainly, both police forces and citizens would benefit from legal clarity. It would appear from the Commission white paper on AI that the Commission shares this view, as they allude on further regulation of systems for facial recognition.[[CiteRef::peetersFacialRecognitionBrussels2020]]</blockquote>

Revision as of 15:35, 12 March 2021

Facial Recognition in Brussels Airport (Stopped)
Excluded from graph
Deployment Status Finished
Deployment Start Date
Deployment End Date
Events
City Zaventem
Country Belgium
Involved Entities
Keywords
Technology Deployed
Information Certainty
Primary sources
Datasets Used
Deployment Type
runs search software
managed by
used by
Potentially used by
Information Certainty 0
Summary 0


Deployment Purpose: Surveillance

Summary
0


Products and Institutions:

Product DeployedUnknown Technology 0006
Institutions Unknown Institution 0012
DatasetsLive camera feeds
Search software

Status and Events:

StatusStopped
EventsStart (1 July 2019, Documented, ?, No description)
End (20 September 2019, Documented, ?, No description)
Start Date
End Date

Users:

Involved EntitiesBelgian Data Protection Authority (GBA)
Managed byBelgian Federal Police
Used byBelgian Federal Police


Location:

CityZaventem
Country Belgium
Loading map...


Description[ ]

Description[edit | ]

Il s’agit d’une information rapportée vendredi par De Standaard et confirmée par l’Organe de contrôle de l’information policière (COC).

Marc De Mesmaeker avait annoncé en juillet dernier dans le magazine Knack que des caméras à reconnaissance faciale automatique seraient mises en place à l’aéroport. Une modification législative pour ce faire n’était, selon lui, pas nécessaire.

Le COC voyait l’initiative d’un autre oeil et a ouvert une enquête. Entre-temps, l’organe de contrôle a ordonné que le projet soit provisoirement abandonné. «Et la police fédérale a confirmé que c’était le cas», a indiqué Frank Schuermans, conseiller au COC. L’instance a établi que le projet contrevenait à la loi sur la fonction de police et celle sur la protection des données. «La surveillance par caméra reste possible, mais la reconnaissance faciale ne l’est pas», a précisé le conseiller.

La police fédérale a expliqué au journal flamand être déjà en train de se pencher sur l’avis du COC avec les partenaires impliqués dans le projet. La police ambitionne d’ailleurs toujours d’utiliser la reconnaissance faciale.1


Finished

Possible use of Clearview AI[edit | ]

The tests at Brussels Airport – as well as recent reporting on possible use by police officers of Clearview AI – shows that clear legal guidelines are needed. As the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) rightfully states in its recent guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices, the use of biometric data – facial recognition in particular – entails heightened risks for data subjects’ rights. Certainly, both police forces and citizens would benefit from legal clarity. It would appear from the Commission white paper on AI that the Commission shares this view, as they allude on further regulation of systems for facial recognition.2

References

  1. ^  "La police fédérale testait la reconnaissance faciale à l’aéroport de Zaventem: elle doit arrêter". (2019) <https://www.sudinfo.be/id142230/article/2019-09-20/la-police-federale-testait-la-reconnaissance-faciale-laeroport-de-zaventem-elle> Accessed: 2021-03-11
  2. ^  "Facial recognition at Brussels Airport: face down in the mud.". (2020) <https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/blog/facial-recognition-at-brussels-airport-face-down-in-the-mud/> Accessed: 2021-03-11