Difference between revisions of "Mapping CV in Security: Literature Review"
From Security Vision
(Created page with "== Literature on how computer vision works == == Literature on the ethical and normative impact of computer vision == == Literature on the sociology of security professional...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Literature on how computer vision works == | + | ==Literature on how computer vision works== |
| − | + | * Computer science | |
| + | * STS: explaining the relation between machines & humans in computer vision | ||
| − | == Literature on the | + | ==Literature on the ethical and normative impact of computer vision== |
| − | == What is currently lacking == | + | * Computer vision is good |
| + | * Computer vision is baaaaad | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Literature on the politics of security professionals using AI and such technologies== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Bourdieu-inspired work | ||
| + | ** Focus on disposition of professionals, field, etc. | ||
| + | ** Not opening the black box of technology | ||
| + | * Latour / STS-inspired work | ||
| + | ** Looking at how technologies actually work | ||
| + | ** Tendency (see Amoore) to fetishise and reify technology | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==What is currently lacking== | ||
| + | <br /> | ||
Revision as of 10:41, 2 March 2021
Literature on how computer vision works[edit | ]
- Computer science
- STS: explaining the relation between machines & humans in computer vision
Literature on the ethical and normative impact of computer vision[edit | ]
- Computer vision is good
- Computer vision is baaaaad
Literature on the politics of security professionals using AI and such technologies[edit | ]
- Bourdieu-inspired work
- Focus on disposition of professionals, field, etc.
- Not opening the black box of technology
- Latour / STS-inspired work
- Looking at how technologies actually work
- Tendency (see Amoore) to fetishise and reify technology
What is currently lacking[edit | ]