Difference between revisions of "DataWorks Plus"

From Security Vision
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
}}
 
}}
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
[[is manager::Todd Pastorini]]<ref>hillWrongfullyAccusedAlgorithm2020</ref>
+
 
 +
== Controversy ==
 +
<blockquote>In 2019, algorithms from both companies were included in a federal study of over 100 facial recognition systems that found they were biased, falsely identifying African-American and Asian faces 10 times to 100 times more than Caucasian faces.<ref name=":0" /></blockquote>[[is manager::Todd Pastorini]]<ref name=":0">hillWrongfullyAccusedAlgorithm2020</ref>
 +
<references />

Revision as of 18:42, 10 February 2021

DataWorks Plus
Institution Full Name DataWorks Plus
Excluded from graph
Creation Date
City
Branches
Is Department Of
Institution Type Company
Instititution Sector Software
Importance 0
Clients


Keywords Computer Vision, Facial Recognition
Related Institutions


Institution Sector: Security



Description[edit | ]

Controversy[edit | ]

In 2019, algorithms from both companies were included in a federal study of over 100 facial recognition systems that found they were biased, falsely identifying African-American and Asian faces 10 times to 100 times more than Caucasian faces.[1]

Todd Pastorini[1]

  1. 1.0 1.1 hillWrongfullyAccusedAlgorithm2020