Difference between revisions of "Mapping CV in Security: Literature Review"
From Security Vision
m (Francesco moved page Review of theory to Mapping CV in Security: Literature Review) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Literature on how computer vision works== | ==Literature on how computer vision works== | ||
− | * Computer science | + | *Computer science |
− | * STS: explaining the relation between machines & humans in computer vision | + | *STS: explaining the relation between machines & humans in computer vision |
==Literature on the ethical and normative impact of computer vision== | ==Literature on the ethical and normative impact of computer vision== | ||
− | * Computer vision is good | + | *Computer vision is good |
− | * Computer vision is baaaaad | + | *Computer vision is baaaaad |
+ | **Privacy | ||
+ | **Ethnic & racial bias | ||
==Literature on the politics of security professionals using AI and such technologies== | ==Literature on the politics of security professionals using AI and such technologies== | ||
− | * Bourdieu-inspired work | + | *Bourdieu-inspired work |
− | ** Focus on disposition of professionals, field, etc. | + | **Focus on disposition of professionals, field, etc. |
− | ** Not opening the black box of technology | + | **Not opening the black box of technology |
− | * Latour / STS-inspired work | + | *Latour / STS-inspired work |
− | ** Looking at how technologies actually work | + | **Looking at how technologies actually work |
− | ** Tendency (see Amoore) to fetishise and reify technology | + | **Tendency (see Amoore) to fetishise and reify technology |
==What is currently lacking== | ==What is currently lacking== | ||
<br /> | <br /> |
Latest revision as of 11:18, 2 March 2021
Literature on how computer vision works[edit | ]
- Computer science
- STS: explaining the relation between machines & humans in computer vision
Literature on the ethical and normative impact of computer vision[edit | ]
- Computer vision is good
- Computer vision is baaaaad
- Privacy
- Ethnic & racial bias
Literature on the politics of security professionals using AI and such technologies[edit | ]
- Bourdieu-inspired work
- Focus on disposition of professionals, field, etc.
- Not opening the black box of technology
- Latour / STS-inspired work
- Looking at how technologies actually work
- Tendency (see Amoore) to fetishise and reify technology
What is currently lacking[edit | ]