Difference between revisions of "DataWorks Plus"
From Security Vision
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Institution | {{Institution | ||
|Institution Full Name=DataWorks Plus | |Institution Full Name=DataWorks Plus | ||
| + | |City=Greenvillle (SC) | ||
|Institution Type=Company | |Institution Type=Company | ||
| − | |Institution Sector= | + | |Institution Sector=Security |
| + | |Not in graph=Greens Report 2021 | ||
|Research Category=Object of Analysis | |Research Category=Object of Analysis | ||
|Keywords=Computer Vision, Facial Recognition | |Keywords=Computer Vision, Facial Recognition | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
| − | |||
== Controversy == | == Controversy == | ||
<blockquote>In 2019, algorithms from both companies were included in a federal study of over 100 facial recognition systems that found they were biased, falsely identifying African-American and Asian faces 10 times to 100 times more than Caucasian faces.<ref name=":0" /></blockquote>[[is manager::Todd Pastorini]]<ref name=":0">hillWrongfullyAccusedAlgorithm2020</ref> | <blockquote>In 2019, algorithms from both companies were included in a federal study of over 100 facial recognition systems that found they were biased, falsely identifying African-American and Asian faces 10 times to 100 times more than Caucasian faces.<ref name=":0" /></blockquote>[[is manager::Todd Pastorini]]<ref name=":0">hillWrongfullyAccusedAlgorithm2020</ref> | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:40, 19 February 2024
Institution Sector: Security
Description[edit | ]
Controversy[edit | ]
In 2019, algorithms from both companies were included in a federal study of over 100 facial recognition systems that found they were biased, falsely identifying African-American and Asian faces 10 times to 100 times more than Caucasian faces.[1]